Raellic wrote:I am a lawyer in California. I have had numerous requests for advice regarding the recent changes in the law. I previously avoided providing tax advice as a matter of policy, but it's become so important and so often asked for that I finally gave in this year. As a new tax practitioner, let me just say: I am amazed at how interested people are in taxes and saving money versus how little they are willing to spend to actually gain the benefit of tax advice. I charge hourly and unfortunately, most people are simply not willing to spend that much even if it only takes me a couple of hours to do something. Most prospects I'm actually looking for (self-employed individuals with challenging situations) are already well-taken care of by other tax professionals. It's been an interesting learning process, and throwing my hat in the ring is directly related to the new aspects of the tax law.
For some reason, clients have more trouble accepting the fees/hourly rates for a Tax Accountant than they are from Lawyers, doctors, contractors, etc.
I find that charging a billable hour/hourly rate is off putting to Tax clients, so what I have done is do my best to incorporate the hourly fee I have in my mind, into some "fixed" pricing/fees on the engagement letter.
It involves estimating and calculating how much time I will spend on the account, so of course I make sure to include a "buffer" to account for that. Sometimes I'll end up severely undercharging, so I will update with an increased fee on next year's engagement letter.
Being a new tax practitioner, it may take you a couple of years to truly gauge the amount of time you spend on such matters, though.
when i do specifically state an hourly rate is for when I represent clients for audits and such. I spend time and money driving to IRS offices and speaking on the phone with them, the hourly rate is the only way to go when it comes to representation services.