sjrcpa wrote:Lawyers and liability insurers say we should never do this [ . . .]
I would agree that having the tax practitioner be named as the Partnership Representative would generally be a very bad idea.
I don't think any one has done it yet since it's a new thing. I don't believe any audits have commenced yet.
IRS audits of 2018 Form 1065 returns are under way. Our firm received a notice of one in early August. That one is now on its way to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.
A few days ago, we learned that another client is going to be audited on a 2018 Form 1065 that we prepared. The IRS Revenue Agent has not yet sent any written correspondence or request on this one.