^^ LOL, that's hysterical. I like that one.
Another concept that works in person is to show them on paper what it would look like if they make $50,000 each year in net profit and did not take ANY distributions for 10 years and lived off of savings or spouse income instead.
I write it out and I explain that they would still pay tax on the $50,000 net profit each year.
But then, after 10 year, I ask them if they can take the $500,000 draw tax free.
Most of them will say, "yes, because I already paid tax on the net profit each year".
Bingo.
Some will hesitate and then I will explain to them (visually on paper) that there is no tax on the $500,000 because they already paid tax each year on the $50,000.
Either way, now they can see that the draw is irrelevant for tax purposes (disclaimer, we know that is not always true - but that's complicated).
This has worked well for me.