Forum wants and desires - Patience though ;-)

How to use the discussion board. Post usage questions here.
#1
Posts:
342
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 12:51pm
Location:
Cobleskill, NY
If you want each one separate and distinct, ok, but I figured one thread as a catchall for your list. :ugeek:
 

#2
Posts:
342
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 12:51pm
Location:
Cobleskill, NY
Any way to automate when clicking on links so that the link pops up in a different tab?

I know we can right click, but I'm lazy.
 

#3
chris  
Posts:
1209
Joined:
20-Apr-2014 7:31pm
Location:
New York
You would grow to hate that very quickly if it were the default. 30 clicks...30 new browser tabs...
Site admin and software developer for TaxProTalk.com and https://TheSiteFactory.com
 

#4
makbo  
Posts:
6840
Joined:
23-Apr-2014 3:44pm
Location:
In The Counting House
FSteinCPA wrote:Any way to automate when clicking on links so that the link pops up in a different tab?


I'm gonna comment again, at the risk of further embarrassment, but isn't this an option you can select in your browser? I was schooled traditionally that links should not automatically open up new tabs/windows.
 

#5
Frankly  
Moderator
Posts:
2455
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:08am
Location:
California
Chris wrote:You would grow to hate that very quickly if it were the default. 30 clicks...30 new browser tabs...

He's referring to links to other websites referenced within posts. It's very convenient to open a new tab in those situations, otherwise TaxPro is shutdown and replaced by the linked site - no way to see both.
 

#6
Posts:
342
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 12:51pm
Location:
Cobleskill, NY
Exactly Frankly.

I usually right click and then hit open in new tab, but sometimes I don't.

As for 30 tabs open, not likely as how many different links to we truly click via the forum.

Usually after I open the new tab, I close it when finished.

Not a big deal, either way is fine. Just my preference.

And Mark, if it is, could you point me where to find it. I use Chrome.
 

#7
chris  
Posts:
1209
Joined:
20-Apr-2014 7:31pm
Location:
New York
I misunderstood. Sure, for external links that makes sense. I will see what it takes to make that change.
Site admin and software developer for TaxProTalk.com and https://TheSiteFactory.com
 

#8
Taxaway  
Posts:
348
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 11:25pm
Location:
Boston, MA
Just wondering out load if you could set a default for a href link in a stylesheet for the site (target="_new") or code in the BB template?, but that would load another window. Though it's second nature IMO, to right click for the option to open in another tab.
 

#9
makbo  
Posts:
6840
Joined:
23-Apr-2014 3:44pm
Location:
In The Counting House
FSteinCPA wrote:And Mark, if it is, could you point me where to find it. I use Chrome.


I actually tried installing Chrome recently on an older laptop I use in my kitchen, but unfortunately, Chrome does not allow one to change the default installation location (unlike almost all Windows programs), which violates my IT policies, so I had to uninstall it.

Anyone who uses HTML knows that a link can be coded in the source to either open a new page or not. However several major browsers (Firefox, Explorer) have Options settings that control such things as "open new links in a new tab", etc. I'm not sure if these options are limited to links opened from other programs (e.g. Adobe Reader) or from within the browser itself. What I do know is that I have Firefox on two different Windows machines, and on one machine, links from news.google.com always open in a new tab, and on the other, they do not, and I don't really know why, despite having the options configured the same.

You can search and find many indications about why it is bad form to automatically open a new window without warning. Here are a few:
Opening up new browser windows is like a vacuum cleaner sales person who starts a visit by emptying an ash tray on the customer's carpet. Don't pollute my screen with any more windows, thanks (particularly since current operating systems have miserable window management). If I want a new window, I will open it myself!

From the usability point of view the decision to enforce opening links in new windows violates one of the fundamental principles of the user interface design: users should always be in control of the interface they are interacting with.
 

#10
Taxaway  
Posts:
348
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 11:25pm
Location:
Boston, MA
Another suggestion for Chris: I notice the green topic bar which reads "last poster last post." Is the intent to eventually display the time lag from the last post, ie 1 day, 1 week, etc. Though the latest date is listed under the topic, this could help getting a quick sense of the age of posts.
 

#11
Taxaway  
Posts:
348
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 11:25pm
Location:
Boston, MA
Okay, I see now the last post does show the post time (but with smaller display resolution than I was using.)
 

#12
chris  
Posts:
1209
Joined:
20-Apr-2014 7:31pm
Location:
New York
I do like the "10 hours ago" or "4 months ago" style of dating a post, including the last post information on a topic, on the forum overview page. I think stating it that way conveys better information than simply showing the post timestamp and requiring the person looking at it to do the mental date math.

However, this is one of the weak spots in our phpBB software -- it really doesn't give me the option. Furthermore, since phpBB allows the user to change the date format (in the user control panel), I have even less control over how timestamps are rendered.

I'd have to write a simple date parser of my own, which I would like to do but will need some time to get to it. It's on the list ;-)
Site admin and software developer for TaxProTalk.com and https://TheSiteFactory.com
 

#13
Posts:
342
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 12:51pm
Location:
Cobleskill, NY
So far so good. I already like the ease of this better than TA.

While I am not sure I like it, but is there a way to reply to a specific post?

I know other boards have it. I do not like it by itself, but if users can switch formats on and off, i Like to both have the linear approach, making it easier to read all posts, but then I like to switch into the reply to poster mode to reply directly.

If have to choose one or the other, I prefer linear as opposed to the reply to poster format, but if i can switch back and forth, that would be awesome and yes I realize that I typed the request twice in slightly different ways, but it's late and I was out. lol
 

#14
chris  
Posts:
1209
Joined:
20-Apr-2014 7:31pm
Location:
New York
Nope, that's one of the things that vbulletin has which phpbb doesn't have. If you want to reply to a specific post here, you need to use that "quote" button at the upper right corner of the post you wish to reference.
Site admin and software developer for TaxProTalk.com and https://TheSiteFactory.com
 

#15
CathysTaxes  
Moderator
Posts:
3557
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:41am
Location:
Suburb of Chicago
FSteinCPA wrote:So far so good. I already like the ease of this better than TA.

While I am not sure I like it, but is there a way to reply to a specific post?

I know other boards have it. I do not like it by itself, but if users can switch formats on and off, i Like to both have the linear approach, making it easier to read all posts, but then I like to switch into the reply to poster mode to reply directly.

If have to choose one or the other, I prefer linear as opposed to the reply to poster format, but if i can switch back and forth, that would be awesome and yes I realize that I typed the request twice in slightly different ways, but it's late and I was out. lol



Fred, if you click the Quote button in the upper right hand side, you ca reply to a specific post.
Cathy
CathysTaxes
 

#16
Posts:
281
Joined:
23-Apr-2014 2:03pm
Location:
Massachusetts
Chris wrote:I do like the "10 hours ago" or "4 months ago" style of dating a post, including the last post information on a topic, on the forum overview page. I think stating it that way conveys better information than simply showing the post timestamp and requiring the person looking at it to do the mental date math.

I really hate the "10 hours ago" or "4 months ago" style of dating a post. I think stating it that way forces the user to do the mental math to determine whether or not the post was made before or after 11pm when I stopped surfing to go to bed, or before Friday the 2nd when I started vacation, or before or after April 15, etc. Mentally, until I do the math, my mind considers "4 months ago" to be the equivalent of "more than a week or two ago but less than a year" - in other words, without the mental math, it's pretty useless info to me.

With explicit dates, if I know a post was made Friday, May 16, it will always show as May 16. If I'm searching for it by date the following Tue, I can just look for May 16 instead of trying to figure out whether that was four days ago or five. If I see 9pm or 3am, I know right away whether or not I could have seen it last night before gong to bed.
 

#17
Frankly  
Moderator
Posts:
2455
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:08am
Location:
California
I agree. But that's not a vote or a thumb's up. I just agree. But in the grand scheme of things it's the tiniest of nits. Much bigger issues to deal with - like posters who write nitty responses like this one.
 

#18
chris  
Posts:
1209
Joined:
20-Apr-2014 7:31pm
Location:
New York
Well at least you made the point that no matter what I do there will always be someone (or "someones") who like it to be different. That's a good thing and what differentiates us from Borg (I suppose).

The way boards like this "solve" that problem is by offering different themes or styles that the user can select from, as well as various settings in the user control panel. It is a little weak on the date/time formatting, admittedly.

Hey I could switch it to the number of elapsed seconds from the UNIX base timestamp (standard epoch) of 1/1/1970.

Then we could say things like "Hey did you see that post from MassTaxPro at 1400251788?" :D :D
Site admin and software developer for TaxProTalk.com and https://TheSiteFactory.com
 

#19
Wiles  
Posts:
5052
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:42am
Location:
CA
Chris, you are a :geek: !! Wear it with pride.
 

#20
Posts:
281
Joined:
23-Apr-2014 2:03pm
Location:
Massachusetts
Yeah, but what will you do when we overflow the epoch? :ugeek:
 

Next

Return to Forum Usage Q&A



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests