501(c)(3) and Home office

Technical topics regarding tax preparation.
#1
KarenF  
Posts:
82
Joined:
3-Jun-2015 7:19am
Location:
Boston
A clergy client is in the process of starting a 501(c)(3): a religious community - an alternative to a traditional synagogue. She plans to start the organization by running it out of her home, specifically the basement (100% use), the kitchen and the dining room (occasional use). She’s asking me if she can receive any benefit for the use of her home. She will not be drawing a salary from the organization until there is adequate income. But even if she draws payroll, the home office deduction would no longer be an option anyways. Other potential options - 1. Can the 501(c)(3) pay her rent or would this be considered “self-dealing”? 2. Can she take a charitable donation for the business use percentage of utilities, homeowners insurance, etc? Other ideas? Thank you.
 

#2
JR1  
Posts:
6132
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:31am
Location:
Western 'burbs of Chicago
I'd vote for 2, once they have the (c)(3). Alter for Professor Lenny's comment below.

Better yet, why not get reimbursed? Much better choice.
Last edited by JR1 on 1-May-2018 9:19am, edited 1 time in total.
Go Blackhawks! Go Pack Go!
Remembering our son, Ben Jan 22, 1992 to Aug 26, 2011.
For FB'ers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/BenRoberts/
 

#3
Nilodop  
Posts:
18882
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:28am
Location:
Pennsylvania
I'd first check Rev Rul 69-473, especially its last sentence.
However, amounts the taxpayers would have expended had the woman not been in their household (such as the cost of rent, utilities, taxes, insurance, and similar items) are not charitable contributions under section 170 of the Code.

 

#4
JR1  
Posts:
6132
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:31am
Location:
Western 'burbs of Chicago
OK, professor. Nice work. So #3, reimbursement is the only option.
Go Blackhawks! Go Pack Go!
Remembering our son, Ben Jan 22, 1992 to Aug 26, 2011.
For FB'ers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/BenRoberts/
 

#5
Posts:
2809
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:34pm
Location:
North Carolina
She may could take a percentage of the utilities as charitable contributions. See the Van Dusen case.
http://www.legalbitstream.com/scripts/i ... f8d/32/doc
 

#6
Nilodop  
Posts:
18882
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:28am
Location:
Pennsylvania
Ah, yes, the cat lady. There, the court allowed some utilities expenses based pretty much on this.
Her utility bills would have been significantly lower because she would not have had to run a special ventilation system, do as much laundry, or dispose of as much cat waste.
That's easily distinguished from that sentence I excerpted from the 69 rev rul.

Isn't it interesting that the 69 rev rul says you can't take the expenses as out-of-pocket contributions, yet the home-office reimbursement is arguably part of an accountable plan?

I do wonder whether the religious community has the funds for a reimbursement.
Last edited by Nilodop on 1-May-2018 2:08pm, edited 1 time in total.
 

#7
JR1  
Posts:
6132
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 9:31am
Location:
Western 'burbs of Chicago
Reimburse first is the rule in charity/church land...then housing if you qualify, then salary.
Go Blackhawks! Go Pack Go!
Remembering our son, Ben Jan 22, 1992 to Aug 26, 2011.
For FB'ers: https://www.facebook.com/groups/BenRoberts/
 

#8
KarenF  
Posts:
82
Joined:
3-Jun-2015 7:19am
Location:
Boston
Okay. Thx everyone!
 


Return to Taxation



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gatortaxguy, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], jhanle1948, JR1, jwmatorres, MAPCPA60, missingdonut, nashtax, NGeorgiaCPA, Nightsnorkeler, taxcpa, Trailman423, William S, zl28 and 122 guests