However, amounts the taxpayers would have expended had the woman not been in their household (such as the cost of rent, utilities, taxes, insurance, and similar items) are not charitable contributions under section 170 of the Code.
That's easily distinguished from that sentence I excerpted from the 69 rev rul.Her utility bills would have been significantly lower because she would not have had to run a special ventilation system, do as much laundry, or dispose of as much cat waste.
Users browsing this forum: gatortaxguy, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], jhanle1948, JR1, jwmatorres, MAPCPA60, missingdonut, nashtax, NGeorgiaCPA, Nightsnorkeler, taxcpa, Trailman423, William S, zl28 and 122 guests