Jake wrote:Further complicating matters is that the 5 digit ZIP Codes could cover multiple total sales tax rates. The 9 digit ZIP Codes for purchasers would likely be needed.
Nilodop wrote:Street addresses are highly standardized these days, just think of the Zillow or Google maps or credit reporting bureau databases. And the post office vending machine knows all the street addresses when you mail a Priority package, just from a few initial characters.. Probably for the most part, but:
The post office that serves me straddles 2 counties.
The township I am in is served by 2 different post offices.
My house number is different in the USPS records from what it is in my county property records. Not even close.
My street has even and odd township numbers on the same side of the street, but the USPS numbers follow the normal pattern.
Some of the residents on my street use the township number as their address, others use the USPS number.
My street names is spelled differently in the USPS records from what it is in my county property records.
As a result of some or all of the above, I have received jury duty notices from the county I do not live in
Nilodop wrote:Probably for the most part, but:
Nilodop wrote:Some of the residents on my street use the township number as their address
JR1 wrote:Nope. You still have different definitions, Cathy. In some states, services are taxable. New Mex has a Gross Receipts Tax that is used on services. I think..maybe Wash. State does something like that? So there's too much to know? A. What is taxable? B. Where? Where was it delivered/sold/etc.? C. What's the rate for that particular spot whatever the answer to B. is? D. Will this then subject us to registering to do biz in that jurisdiction? E. Will that, if yes, then subject us to annual biz filings as well?
This is so much bigger than some here want to believe. And it affects every one of us in business, unless you and all your clients only conduct all their business at the country diner over breakfast.
JR1 wrote:This is so much bigger than some here want to believe.
JR1 wrote:able/willing to shell out some fairly serious money for it.
JR1 wrote:Then, what about ALL THE OTHER ISSUES YOU IGNORE!!!???[,,,].and someone is trying to unify the un-unifiable.
makbo wrote:Yes, the free ride at the expense of taxpayers who actually pay tax is over. [/i]
CaptCook wrote:There has never actually been a free ride. There has only been noncompliance by individuals.
makbo wrote:As I already pointed out, "[Avalara's] solutions easily manage complex tax issues such as nexus, exemptions, product taxability, sourcing rules, split rates, sales tax holidays, tax caps/thresholds and more.""
missingdonut wrote:Well, geez, if a marketing pamphlet says it's simple, it absolutely must be! How foolish we all are!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 69 guests