Assets Omitted; 3115 or 1120X?

Technical topics regarding tax preparation.
#1
EADave  
Posts:
1427
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 9:25pm
Location:
Texas
Client’s books weren’t necessarily the cleanest the past two years (2018 is clean as a whistle). New bookkeeper uncovers a few assets (less than $25K in total cost) that were omitted from the balance sheet, and thus the 1120S returns we filed.

I know this isn’t a rare circumstance, but I’ve never run across it. Is a 3115 required to recoup the missed depreciation or can we file a 1120-X? And, since the 2018 was extended, but filed in April, can I amend it with a 3115?

Thanks for any advice.
 

#2
Noobie  
Posts:
1134
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:35pm
Location:
Jacksonville, FL
Amend if you have not filed the next year's return. 3115 if you have.
 

#3
Coddington  
Moderator
Posts:
2572
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 8:50pm
Location:
Fort Worth, TX
How were they booked originally?

I'm guessing the balance sheet at least balanced, right?
-Brian

Director of Tax Accounting Methods & Credits
SourceAdvisors.com

Opinions my own.
 

#4
Noobie  
Posts:
1134
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:35pm
Location:
Jacksonville, FL
 

#5
sjrcpa  
Posts:
6575
Joined:
23-Apr-2014 5:27pm
Location:
Maryland
re Post #3 - If the assets weren't on the Balance Sheet, did they get recorded as expenses on the P&L?
 

#6
Posts:
2810
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:34pm
Location:
North Carolina
I'm thinking like sjrcpa. Sounds like they may have been expensed if they were reconciling the bank statement as of year end, and they don't show up on balance sheet; or were they each less than $2,500 and therefore deminimis?
 

#7
Coddington  
Moderator
Posts:
2572
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 8:50pm
Location:
Fort Worth, TX
How they were booked originally could have an impact on the type of method change, if any, that is available. If they were expensed and that rises to the level of a method of accounting, it would be DCN 192.
-Brian

Director of Tax Accounting Methods & Credits
SourceAdvisors.com

Opinions my own.
 

#8
EADave  
Posts:
1427
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 9:25pm
Location:
Texas
I know that some were DMSH, as some were under the $2,500 threshold, and I brought this up to the client.

The other assets were recorded on a defunct company (wrong QB file) in error. Their Balance Sheet was always off, negative liabilities, loan balances not properly adjusted. I took some liberties of making the appropriate adjustments on the return to force it to balance. Messy, I know, but I try to avoid IRS scrutiny as best I can with messy books.
 

#9
Posts:
67
Joined:
26-Apr-2014 4:59pm
Location:
Louisa, VA
I hadn't realized my old boss moved to Texas....LOL
 

#10
Noobie  
Posts:
1134
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:35pm
Location:
Jacksonville, FL
Sounds like a client we used to have. Construction company run by Albanians (I think).
 

#11
Coddington  
Moderator
Posts:
2572
Joined:
21-Apr-2014 8:50pm
Location:
Fort Worth, TX
Amending to claim section 179 would be the best strategy, even if it just results in a section 179 carryforward due to a loss.
-Brian

Director of Tax Accounting Methods & Credits
SourceAdvisors.com

Opinions my own.
 

#12
EADave  
Posts:
1427
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 9:25pm
Location:
Texas
Just some clients that got a little too big too fast and wanted to skimp on proper bookkeeping, happens all too often. Like the clients that don’t want to hire an attorney to properly create their business entity and formation docs.

Thank you for the replies all. Funny ones too.
 


Return to Taxation



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: batjudge, chicagocpa, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], keninmichigan, lckent, MilesR, Permanently-Diff, rdk70, SumwunLost, TAXMASTER, TheAnswerMan and 130 guests