https://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/research/wh ... nterestingThe case involves a home and real estate development construction company that was under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for 2013. During the course of the audit the company was found to have buried in its construction expenses over $121,000 of expenses related to the cost and parts for a ’68 Camaro that was used as a race car by the son of the company’s founder.
andExpenses paid in 2013 with respect to the 68 Camaro would be deductible, if at all, through depreciation or as startup expenses ...
. Fven though the wording includes "if at all" and "if the 68 Camaro were a depreciable asset", that douby seems to relate to whether there was a business at all and whether that business had begun in the year the expenses were claimed.If the 68 Camaro were a depreciable asset, the cost of acquiring the race car and getting it ready for racing would constitute an acquisition cost that is not currently deductible. See sec. 1.263(a)-2T(d), (k), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 76 Fed. [*16] Reg. 81102, 81107 (Dec. 27, 2011). A capital asset that is used in an activity for profit may be depreciated beginning for the tax year in which the asset was placed in service. Sec. 1.167(a)-10(b), Income Tax Regs.
Nilodop wrote:Would they have to go into Class 79.0, Recreation? I hope not.
Users browsing this forum: Ask Jeeves [Bot], beardenjv, DAJCPA, GRobCPA, JessCPA113, JR1, Nightsnorkeler, pwmichaelsr, rkrcpa, SALYstrikesagain, SlipperyPencil and 131 guests