gatortaxguy wrote:The idea that a small company with minimal assets has some sort of problem with an exit strategy is not something that strikes me as significant in the real world. The question here is what's in the client's best interests. A $100k rule of thumb is ludicrous.
JR1 wrote:LOL. What are you saying, Missing? lol
missingdonut wrote:JR1 wrote:LOL. What are you saying, Missing? lol
Actually, it's a compliment. I've been reading you and others here here since it was the old TaxAlmanac board, and you're aggressive when it's possible but you tend to have some pretty no-nonsense limits on it. If I'm reading a post and find that you wouldn't take as aggressive of a position as I would, it makes me think twice.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 90 guests