Technical topics regarding tax preparation.
13-Oct-2021 12:55pm
- Posts:
- 806
- Joined:
- 21-Nov-2018 5:00pm
- Location:
- CA
My client's income went up in 2020 over 2019. My client is a sole proprietor. My software doesn't address this. I have to add back the expenses paid with PPP loan for CA.
Where do I add back this amount? Which line on schedule CA adjustments? Thanks.
13-Oct-2021 1:28pm
- Posts:
- 1618
- Joined:
- 24-Apr-2014 6:48pm
- Location:
- California
Have you looked at it quarter by quarter?
13-Oct-2021 1:46pm
- Posts:
- 1375
- Joined:
- 22-Apr-2014 9:07am
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
I am not in CA nor am I a CA expert, but I just came across the same situation for a client of mine. If the PPP funds were used to pay personal expenses and were essentially treated as "owner replacement compensation" or whatever they were calling it, is an add-back even necessary?
13-Oct-2021 2:19pm
- Posts:
- 82
- Joined:
- 1-May-2014 2:47pm
- Location:
- Southern California
Nightsnorkeler wrote:...is an add-back even necessary?
Yes. AB80 addressed this.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB80 For OP, your adjustment should show up on Sch CA, Part I-B, Line 3C...
13-Oct-2021 3:19pm
- Posts:
- 1375
- Joined:
- 22-Apr-2014 9:07am
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
I know I just can't let this go right now, it just doesn't make sense to me.
AB 80 says that if you don't meet the 25% reduction test, then AB 80 doesn't apply to you and you are bound by AB 1577.
AB 1577 says that expenses paid with forgiven PPP funds are non-deductible.
Am I wrong with either of those statements? If not, then why would a SE taxpayer who used the PPP money for personal expenses need to add-back anything? The PPP was used to pay already non-deductible expenses.
As I stated before I am not in CA and only do a handful of mostly simple CA returns each year so I am not trying to argue that I am correct. It just doesn't make sense to me.
13-Oct-2021 3:29pm
- Posts:
- 82
- Joined:
- 1-May-2014 2:47pm
- Location:
- Southern California
I fully agree with you, I still do not understand...I guess I have let it go. I've not yet found a reasonable "Why?" myself -- other than a childish "Because. It just is!"
Through April then May and June, as this all was being codified I read, astonished, at the legislature's action on this...
Return to Taxation
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: batjudge, chicagocpa, Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], keninmichigan, lckent, MilesR, Nilodop, Permanently-Diff, rbynaker, rdk70, SumwunLost, TAXMASTER, TheAnswerMan and 122 guests