job costing

Any non-Tax accounting topics go here.
#1
juro  
Posts:
918
Joined:
18-Oct-2015 9:11am
Location:
USA
My client, a construction contractor, has a new job where the customer will be supplying all materials.
What will happen is the customer will sell them to my client, and also pay my client the exact funds to pay the bill.

There will be zero mark-up. My client will use the funds to pay for the materials.
The purpose here will be better logistics, as the materials will be available on-site where the job is performed.

Does my client need to include these materials in Cost of Goods Sold? total cost of materials is $1.2 million.

My client wants to call this job a "labor only" job.

Consignment issue?
 

#2
Posts:
2772
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:34pm
Location:
North Carolina
Why not just have the customer purchase and pay for the materials and have them delivered to job site?
 

#3
Posts:
2887
Joined:
21-May-2018 7:50am
Location:
Northern MI and Coastal SC
Seaside CPA wrote:Why not just have the customer purchase and pay for the materials and have them delivered to job site?


I am wondering the same thing. The structure the client/customer have arranged makes zero sense to me. I did some construction accounting up until the real estate/construction crash and got out of it, entirely. While it is not uncommon for a customer to source some materials and have them delivered to job site, I have never heard of it running through the way they are indicating.

But to answer your question, my initial thought is it would still have COGS since your client is "buying" the materials from the customer, and the customer is also paying the contractor that exact amount. The "income" is offset by the COGS.

Why is your client wanting to call it labor only?
 

#4
juro  
Posts:
918
Joined:
18-Oct-2015 9:11am
Location:
USA
I don't know why.. They say i would never have known otherwise, but my job is to collect info.
 

#5
Doug M  
Posts:
3558
Joined:
22-Apr-2014 1:09pm
Location:
Oregon
I see this as a method to bypass the sales tax. I'll bet the contractor has a resale certificate. I have no idea about rules for sales tax in FL. I would assume it is subject to sales tax
 

#6
juro  
Posts:
918
Joined:
18-Oct-2015 9:11am
Location:
USA
 

#7
Posts:
1716
Joined:
28-Jul-2017 12:08pm
Location:
Somewhere out there...
My guess is they want to avoid contractor markup

Is the contractor using the appropriate accounting for long term contracts ?
 

#8
juro  
Posts:
918
Joined:
18-Oct-2015 9:11am
Location:
USA
HenryDavid wrote:
Is the contractor using the appropriate accounting for long term contracts ?


my guess is no.
 

#9
MWEA  
Posts:
315
Joined:
8-Feb-2018 7:37pm
Location:
Minnesota
In regards to long-term contracts for tax purposes, this made me think of a couple questions. This is not my area although I’ve been reading on the topic and I love to show my ignorance on this board!

New client is an exterior contractor, $8 million in sales. Cash basis and definitely meets the small contractor exception. While they have internal job costing software, everything is being reported for taxes on a strictly cash basis. If a down payment comes in, they post it to Sales in QB’s.

Two questions:
1. Is there any requirement they report differently on contracts that stretch over two tax years?

2. If they wanted to move to the CCM, I’m assuming they would need to submit a Change of Accounting request?
 

#10
Posts:
1716
Joined:
28-Jul-2017 12:08pm
Location:
Somewhere out there...
1. It’s not a long-term contract if it doesn’t overlap tax years.

2. Yes

Also - beware of the AMT adjustment for long-term Contracts ...
 

#11
juro  
Posts:
918
Joined:
18-Oct-2015 9:11am
Location:
USA
turns out, all the stuff got delivered to the client's office loading bay. several dozen pallets of material.

this is a surprise to me, the client implied or said to me that the stuff would all be delivered to the job sites.

so much for being a "labor-only" job :roll:

also no packing slips, bills of lading, etc have been provided to me. this is weird.
 

#12
Posts:
1716
Joined:
28-Jul-2017 12:08pm
Location:
Somewhere out there...
Uninstalled materials is another issue
 

#13
eze  
Posts:
311
Joined:
8-May-2014 7:02pm
Location:
Grey Area, California
There could be some sales tax shenanigans going on. There could be incentive to keep the gross revenue low for insurance and bonding reasons. This does happen sometimes when you have a property owner or GC that is trying to negotiate the markup out of the material. It could be a material that you need to be a registered vendor, or there some weird requirement in the supply channel that they are trying to navigate. Sometimes you have to be a "certified installer" for the material. Anyway, it's a little weird. If I was doing a financial statement, I'd definitely want to look into it. If I'm only doing a tax return.....meh treat it as a reimbursed costs and net the two payments.
 

#14
Posts:
1
Joined:
24-Feb-2021 11:27pm
Location:
MD
I agree with @Seaside CPA, Just purchase the material and pay for that only, this will be the best way.
 


Return to General Accounting



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests